What does that mean exactly? Is the company expected to compete or just support existing products or be sold to other owners?
What does that mean exactly? Is the company expected to compete or just support existing products or be sold to other owners?
Beyond what other people are saying, it should be pretty reliable for comparing between exercise sessions so you can see your improvement over time.
You can test this: https://ismy.blue/
Obviously not perfect since it depends on screens and lighting conditions.
What’s the argument for using Angular over other solutions? Let’s say you actually need a SPA.
They see what’s happening in Ukraine where a <$100 drone can kill an enemy soldier. The KDR for their drone aces are insane.
That’s a pretty bad example since most functional frameworks include an any or some function that returns early.
I mean it tends to show up in the FE due to JS being fundamentally callback based. You’re basically responding to events and the like. Unfortunately the language was not designed for reactivity so they’re all added on via frameworks.
Going to the gym won’t make you less skinny. Eating more at a surplus will. Also 1g protein/lb of body weight per day.
Are there benefits in not having a GC in WASM?
Also are there mainstream memory safe languages without a borrow checker? There’s some experimental ones out there.
Rust isn’t strictly functional? Do you mean you’d like a language with garbage collection?
Is this the DENNIS system?
Is it Amazon because they did a really good job at keeping teams separate (via APIs)?
It’s more akin to a plugin since it doesn’t change the code at all.
The actual protocol doesn’t matter, just that the team has to own it and publish it and other teams must use these APIs. Otherwise you get teams adding and modifying other teams code and you end up with the monolith anyways.
It’s been said before that microservices solve organizational problems. When you’re forced to go through official APIs, each team becomes responsible for their own connections to other teams. If you’re at a scale where a few people can be responsible for the entire system there’s really no benefit.
I mean that just means you didn’t hack them well enough.
I’d also say weapon/spell/tool selection as well. They just don’t really care about their UI.
Huh? Every IDE has had this feature for decades. Eclipse, all of JetBrains products, even NetBeans. This is like the most basic feature provided by IDEs.
Also with the development of first party language servers it’s relatively easy for new IDEs to integrate.
A tech company is not like a bank though, its value is not just in assets but in expertise. Is the plan to layoff all the engineers or pay them less? Is the plan the company generates profit? What if it can’t compete anymore and is just a money sink? And if you’re just going to sell it for assets then how’s that different from letting the company go bankrupt?
And licensing it out to contractors? That just sounds like a huge money sink.