

They only have three fingers 🤔
They only have three fingers 🤔
Long live Beth Mole for health news!
Did you tell him about fuzzers yet?
Exactly. This sounds like selection bias in action. If you’re sampling adults who have ADHD and asking if it’s better from when they were kids, you’ve already skewed the results beyond repair. You need to follow kids with ADHD into adulthood and see if it gets better.
I don’t do much frontend work these days, but years ago, it felt like the defining feature of Bootstrap was the 12-column layout. Sure, it had fun buttons and other components, but the ability to trivially define multi-column layout without ripping your hair out was its raison d’être.
Now that we have flexbox, I’m not sure anyone needs Bootstrap.
I’m no AI proponent, but I’ll only believe that LLMs are causing this psychosis when I see a randomized controlled trial. Until then, it seems far more plausible that people experiencing delusions gravitate towards LLMs.
Yeah, exactly. I don’t get it.
You can’t do incremental builds with just
. I don’t see how it’s a replacement?
Usually I remember the inflection and number of syllables of the word I want, just not the actual sounds.
You can also “simply” raw-dog Wireguard. It’s built into the Linux kernel, so you barely have to install anything besides the userspace tools.
Basically, I objected to being reliant on the generosity of a for-profit company. “We do these things not because they are easy, but because we thought they would be easy.”
This is a rough sketch:
wg-quick
.Boom. Tailscale’d.
I’m sure I’ve forgotten some steps. I have some janky automation that’s broken in a new way every time I try to use it.
I thought flies use ZZ
for the onomatopoeia
I have no opinion of them, but I’m curious why advertising would imply untrustworthiness. Are you saying they’re too eager or something? Spending money on ads is also consistent with a company that’s making money by charging for a service — I’d be more suspicious of free VPNs.
Given the warning about capitalization, the best possible case is that they’re using ast.literal_eval() rather than throwing untrusted input into eval()
.
Err, I guess they might be comparing strings to ‘True’ and are choosing to be really strict about capitalization for some reason.
My knife is printf, but my scalpel is gdb.
I honestly think autocorrecting your scripts would do more harm than good. ShellCheck tells you about potential issues, but It’s up to you to determine the correct behavior.
For example, how could it know whether cat $foo
should be cat "$foo"
, or whether the script actually relies on word splitting? It’s possible that $foo
intentionally contains multiple paths.
Maybe there are autofixable errors I’m not thinking of.
FYI, it’s possible to gradually adopt ShellCheck by setting --severity=error
and working your way down to warnings and so on. Alternatively, you can add one-off #shellcheck ignore SC1234
comments before offending lines to silence warnings.
PSA: Run ShellCheck on your shell scripts. It turns up a shocking number of programming errors. https://www.shellcheck.net/
I lived in a semi-rural area where they didn’t check the gas meter for months at a time and just kinda guessed each month.
It is pronounced like “curl” though!
We pronounce curl with an initial k sound. It rhymes with words like girl and earl. This is a short WAV file to help you:
Sounds like you were a 1337 H4X0R back in the day