Whelp, here we go again

  • TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally, I’d rather pay for Nebula than YouTube premium. Most of the creators I actively follow are on there anyways, and the few that aren’t (usually the ones with very long videos) I should probably just watch with ads anyways to support them.

    • ErgodicTangle@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had a similar thought. How fair is nebula to their creators? I heard it was somehow creator owned, but other than that I have no idea how it works.

      • TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My understanding is it’s a joint venture between the creators and some LLC (don’t know too much of the details of that), so the creators have at least some ownership stake. The profits from subscriptions get split evenly based on watch time.

        I remember them doing a lifetime subscription offer that I was intrigued by, but I can afford to support them through a subscription so I didn’t bite on the chance.

    • Hipstershy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nebula is great in comparison, and apparently video creators make even more money from Nebula views than YouTube Premium views, which is already a lot more than ad-supported views.

      Nebula’s content base is small in comparison but very quickly growing and already includes most of the longer-form video creators I would want anyway (Jenny Nicholson is one notable exception, but her Patreon channel is wildly successful so I sort of doubt she feels like torpedoing that to do a whole new platform).

      But frankly, if I paid what I pay for Nebula and only got Jet Lag, it would still be worth it to me.