alessandro@lemmy.ca to

PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 21 days ago

Intel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recover

www.tomshardware.com

150

Intel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recover

www.tomshardware.com

alessandro@lemmy.ca to

PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 21 days ago

Too big to fail.

Chat

BonerMan@ani.social
link
fedilink
arrow-up
1
arrow-down
5·
20 days ago
By that definition Intel isn’t manufacturing either, its foxcon that manufacturers for them.
- Auli@lemmy.ca
  link
  fedilink
  arrow-up
  3
  arrow-down
  1·
  19 days ago
  Huh Intel has its own fabs.

PC Gaming@lemmy.ca

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !pcgaming@lemmy.ca

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

655 users / day
1.96K users / week
4.9K users / month
11.3K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
8.62K subscribers
4.2K Posts
25.7K Comments
Modlog