I genuinely want to understand this. Are the defense systems we are sending so advanced that we can’t let anyone else operate them?

I know politics aren’t allowed here, so i want to stress that I just want to know why this is happening.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Well it’s an explicitly defensive system.

    Yes, that’s what it is named. Government and military projects don’t always have the most transparent naming conventions, though.

    Do we know that it isn’t capable of acting in an offensive capacity as well, should those in control of it choose?

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      The system is incredibly expensive and purpose built.

      There’s no smoke and mirrors, the US is providing much, much cheaper offensive weapons. There’s be no need to wire up a defensive system for that.

      As context, many defensive missiles are pretty low payload, and often (but not always) use a shotgun style blast to hit the intended target. That’s not well suited to ground to ground work, especially when trying to target hardened structures like concrete buildings.

      It’s just not the right tool.