GregorTacTac@lemm.ee to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 8 months agoAverage CSSlemm.eeexternal-linkmessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1567arrow-down119file-text
arrow-up1548arrow-down1external-linkAverage CSSlemm.eeGregorTacTac@lemm.ee to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 8 months agomessage-square86fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePeter_Arbeitsloser@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up34·8 months agoIsn’t cascading styles the whole point of Cascading Style Sheets?
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27arrow-down1·edit-28 months agoYou absolute fool. You must never utter its full name, lest you summon its wrath!
minus-squarewizzor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·8 months agoI don’t get it, isn’t this a pretty normal way of using media queries. Granted you’re more likely to see the widths defined in px.
minus-squareByteOnBikes@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·8 months agoShhh… The poster doesn’t understand CSS and we shouldn’t embarrass them in a community with memes
minus-squarewizzor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoMy imposter syndrome kicked in full swing. I was ready to learn a CSS best practice and feel uncomfortable about it for the rest off the day.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoNowadays we do responsive webdesign instead of micromanaging widths.
minus-squareusernamefactory@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoThis is technically responsive, but I think you have a fair criticism. A single rule like this would be much more maintainable: #content .grid-container { width: 90vw; min-width: 12rem; max-width: 75rem; padding: 2rem 0 1rem; } Obviously, media rules have their place, but not for something that’s consistantly a full width container like this seems to be.
Worse.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3708/e3708ab43fb4c871594ce9ff68ee447049099f30" alt=""
Isn’t cascading styles the whole point of Cascading Style Sheets?
You absolute fool. You must never utter its full name, lest you summon its wrath!
I don’t get it, isn’t this a pretty normal way of using media queries. Granted you’re more likely to see the widths defined in px.
Shhh… The poster doesn’t understand CSS and we shouldn’t embarrass them in a community with memes
My imposter syndrome kicked in full swing. I was ready to learn a CSS best practice and feel uncomfortable about it for the rest off the day.
Nowadays we do responsive webdesign instead of micromanaging widths.
This is technically responsive, but I think you have a fair criticism. A single rule like this would be much more maintainable:
#content .grid-container { width: 90vw; min-width: 12rem; max-width: 75rem; padding: 2rem 0 1rem; }
Obviously, media rules have their place, but not for something that’s consistantly a full width container like this seems to be.