• kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The pipeline should handle formatting. No matter how you screw it up, once you commit, it gets formatted to an agreed upon standard.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    There was a guy I worked with that tended to want to unilaterally make sweeping changes.

    Like, “we need the user to be able to enter their location” -> “cool. Done. I also switched the dependency manager from pip to poetry”.

    Only a little bit of exaggeration

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Had a coworker who was a bit like this. They were tasked to do one simple thing. Required a few lines of code change at most.

    They end up refactoring the entire damn thing and introduced new bugs in the process.

          • onlinepersona@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not with that attitude they won’t 😛

            Refactoring in PRs just makes it more difficult to review. “Do these lines belong to the goal nor not?”. Also, we’re human and miss things. Adding more text to review means the chance of missing something increases.
            Especially if the refactored code isn’t just refactored but modified, things are very easy to miss. Move an entire block of code from one file to another and make changes within = asking for trouble or a “LGTM” without any actual consideration. It makes code reviews more difficult, error-prone, and annoying.

            Code reviews aren’t there to just tick off a box. They are there to ensure what’s on the tin is actually in it and whether it was done well.

            CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

            • nick@campfyre.nickwebster.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              In my experience I haven’t had an issue because usually the refactorings are small. If they’re not I just hop on a call with the person who wrote the MR and ask them to walk me through it.

              In theory I’d like to have time to dedicate solely to code health, but that’s not quite the situation in basically any team I’ve been in.

              • onlinepersona@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I haven’t had any trouble separating refactors PRs from ticket PRs. Make the ticket PR, make a refactor PR on that ticket PR, merge the ticket PR, rebase refactor PR on master, open ticket PR for review, done 🤷

                CC BY-NC-SA 4.0