I have seen many people in this community either talking about switching to Brave, or people who are actively using Brave. I would like to remind people that Brave browser (and by extension their search engine) is not privacy-centric whatsoever.

Brave was already ousted as spyware in the past and the company has made many decisions that are questionable at best. For example, Brave made a cryptocurrency which they then added to a rewards program that is built into the browser to encourage you to enable ads that are controlled by Brave.

Edit: Please be aware that the spyware article on Brave (and the rest of the browsers on the site) is outdated and may not reflect the browser as it is today.

After creating this cryptocurrency and rewards program, they started inserting affiliate codes into URL's. Prior to this they had faked fundraising for popular social media creators.

Do these decisions seem like ones a company that cares about their users (and by extension their privacy) would make? I'd say the answer is a very clear no.

One last thing, Brave illegally promoted an eToro affiliate program making a fortune from its users who will likely lose their money.

Edit: To the people commenting saying how Brave has a good out-of-the-box experience compared to other browsers, yes, it does. However, this is not a warning for your average person, this is a warning for people who actively care about their privacy and don't mind configuring their browser to maximize said privacy.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because all the web devs optimize for chrome because they dominate the market. If more people use Firefox then devs will start to care about performance in it

    (You're a dev so I assume you know this. This comment is mainly for other people)

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really. I've gotten plenty of bugs fixed on other sites by just sending them a screenshot of something going wrong in Firefox. For the big companies like Facebook though you're entirely correct

          • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess we complain as loud and as often as we can. And give our money to companies that support Firefox. Thankfully most of my coworkers, at every company I've worked at, use Firefox use Firefox so the website usually works because they needed it to to do their job

          • Katlah@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We combat the eventual end of it by getting more people to use it. The more people using it the more support it gets.

            • Katlah@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It's the same as someone not voting because they are only one person. Sure, you're only one person, but when millions of people have that exact same thought it makes a difference.

      • raubarno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Add a user agent checker to your website and add tag: 'Your browser, Google Chrome, is not supported. Please open this website on Firefox.'

        Thic could attract masses.

    • Matomo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I'm not sure what it is. I suppose this is the case for the heavier web-applications, but the average website (which is where my expertise is, not actual applications) also feels slightly worse on FF. And as far as I know, I don't use any chrome-specific tricks or optimizations.