Five@slrpnk.net to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoSo Much for ‘Learn to Code’web.archive.orgexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up142arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkSo Much for ‘Learn to Code’web.archive.orgFive@slrpnk.net to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEm Adespoton@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoIndeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Technologies evolve. People coding today in COBOL or Fortran are few and far between (but very well compensated).
minus-squareRickRussell_CA@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-21 year ago Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Umm. Yes.
minus-squaredjango@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYeah sure, i use Emacs to code. In evil mode. A lot of Emacs users use it to code. Why would you think otherwise?
minus-squareMostlyBlindGamer@rblind.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoNo, all the cool kids use Vim.
minus-squaresfera@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year ago Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Sure. Why wouldn't they?
Indeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example?
Technologies evolve. People coding today in COBOL or Fortran are few and far between (but very well compensated).
Umm. Yes.
Yeah sure, i use Emacs to code. In evil mode. A lot of Emacs users use it to code. Why would you think otherwise?
No, all the cool kids use Vim.
Sure. Why wouldn't they?
Hell yea we do use emacs!