0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 12 days agorace conditionsimagemessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1879arrow-down125
arrow-up1854arrow-down1imagerace conditions0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 12 days agomessage-square87linkfedilink
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 days agoFun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
minus-squarenialv7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 days agoI did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 days ago I did say “general purpose”. I did say “fun fact”.
Fun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
I did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
I did say “fun fact”.