Hatred often makes you want to hurt people, but people hurt peope in the name of greed more often, and not only with less potential for guilt, but is often the cause of delusional accolades and reassurance both from within oneself and from others.

Hypothetical:

A CEO lays off 10,000 employees that helped that company succeed, solely to increase earnings and not because the company is hurting, not only seriously hurting 9,997 people, but causing 3 to commit suicide.

A bumpkin gets in a fight with someone he hates the melanin of because he’s a moron and kills them.

Who did more damage to humanity that day? They’re both, I want to say evil but evil is subjective, they’re both highly antisocial, knowingly harmful behaviors, yet one correctly sends you to prison for a long time if not forever, while the other, far more premeditated and quite literally calculated act, is literally rewarded and partied about. Jim Kramer gives you a shout out on tv, good fucking times amirite!

Edit: and this felt relevant to post after someone tried to lecture me about equating layoffs to murder.

“Coca-Cola killed trade unionists in Latin America. General Motors built vehicles known to catch fire. Tobacco companies suppressed cancer research. And Boeing knew that its planes were dangerous. Corporations don’t care if they kill people — as long as it’s profitable.”

https://jacobin.com/2020/01/corporations-profit-values-murder-culture-boeing

  • preasket@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, you’ll never get rid of human self interest, whatever you do. That’s just how biological life works.

    • lingh0e@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a difference between “self interest” and “how much money can I make through unscrupulous means that will harm untold numbers of people I’ll never know”.

      I’ll do anything to protect my family short of something that will bring harm to another family for no other reason than personal profit. There has to be a line.

    • MinekPo1 [She/Her]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      FYI this argument (often referred to as the human nature argument) only holds water when you look at European history. Most other societies had an element of communal property. Also in more developed life (including but not limited to humans), especially in situations of crisis, alturism is more expressed than self interest.

      In other words: socialism is not against human nature. Capitalism is.