It is illegal and immoral. It steals the rightful intellectual property of directors and developers who are only trying to make a living. If you want to be a thief so badly, then rob a federal bank.

  • bbmb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Internet Archive, even outside of their Wayback Machine, is effectively built on digital piracy in many ways if anything. The reality is that any sort of media, whether it’s physical media that was destroyed, or digital media that was deleted or had it’s host platform shut down, could possibly never be accessed again unless it’s archived, even if that archival was done with piracy.

    Mother 3 could be considered impossible to play legally in many ways, with most of the cartridges being sold unofficially with the English ROM hack being preapplied, and the originals starting near 75 dollars on eBay, and Nintendo isn’t making any money off it anymore, so in many cases unless you’re a collector, it’s best to just pirate the game with an English ROM translation.

    The Internet Archive also has an archived online library of books that you’re free to borrow from, similar to an Overdrive-like platform of sorts, which is great for finding information that isn’t publicly available, or to read a book that is simply rare used and not sold anymore or where another copy isn’t to be found.

    • Favrion@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see the comparison. Archiving is beneficial for the freedom of information, but pirating is beneficial for the pirate.

      • bbmb@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I just said was that archiving for preservation often is done with piracy. You need to get the content one way or another to archive, especially with the vast library on there.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which is sometimes not even an option offered and sometimes licencing rules will mean that no matter how many people pay for it, it’s going to be lost to the world without piracy.

            Btw, it’s cute that you think it’s the author you’re supporting, rather than the exploitative and greedy publisher. Downright adorable! 🥹

          • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Archiving digital media is making backups and copies. That is what archiving those things is intrinsically, immutably.

            Making backups and copies is also what the IP owners would refer to as piracy.

            You cannot be pro-internet-archive and anti-piracy at the same time, at least not fully. They are contradictory positions.