Now we are facing an unprecedented growth of AI as a whole. Do you think is time for FSF elaborate a new version of GPL to incorporate the new challenges of AI in software development to keep protecting users freedom?

  • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Copyright is not just about copying the data. It’s a name that stuck but it’s more accurately to call it “author rights”. The law awards the rights holder extensive rights, including deciding how the data is used.

    And (as an aside) permission by omission doesn’t work as an excuse either, if the right to use the data in some way hasn’t been explicitly granted it most likely doesn’t apply.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No that’s not what copyrights are. The idea that they’re “author rights” has no basis in law

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why insist to argue this point when a simple visit to Wikipedia will show I’m right?

      • madkarlsson@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are mistaken and don’t seen to fullt grasp what copyright is.

        > A copyright is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the exclusive right to copy, distribute, adapt, display, and perform a creative work, usually for a limited time.[1][2][3][4][5] The creative work may be in a literary, artistic, educational, or musical form.

        Notice what is states besides copying? First paragraph on wikipedia, come on.