bpt11@sh.itjust.works to Comics@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 month agoJust read "Arkham Asylum: a serious house on a serious earth" for the first time, can we get some appreciation for Dave Mckean's sick artworksh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down11
arrow-up1145arrow-down1external-linkJust read "Arkham Asylum: a serious house on a serious earth" for the first time, can we get some appreciation for Dave Mckean's sick artworksh.itjust.worksbpt11@sh.itjust.works to Comics@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 month agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareMisshapenDeviate@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 month agoCan we also recognize how difficult a lot of the speech bubbles are to read?
minus-squareaddie@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoThe original is quite large-print. Also, completely gorgeous as OP notes. This image could do with a few more of them pixels.
minus-squareMisshapenDeviate@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI have the physical book. I still find it hard to read. That does not detract from how fantastic it looks, and I did not mean to imply it did.
minus-squareaddie@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoAh, fair enough - thought you might have only seen a picture like this if it, which doesn’t give a good impression if it. Apologies.
Can we also recognize how difficult a lot of the speech bubbles are to read?
The original is quite large-print. Also, completely gorgeous as OP notes. This image could do with a few more of them pixels.
I have the physical book. I still find it hard to read. That does not detract from how fantastic it looks, and I did not mean to imply it did.
Ah, fair enough - thought you might have only seen a picture like this if it, which doesn’t give a good impression if it. Apologies.