There were in fact stupid questions.

It has nothing to do with “opposing ideologies”, it is how you are behaving like toxic assholes 100% of the time.

Nah, it is just a lot of hexbear alt accounts like yourself on your disingenously labeled “reasonable” side.

What a disingenous comment. Having two accounts of two defederated instances makes even more sense than having them on two federated instances.

A lot of US defaultism going on in this thread. Americans (and perhaps British) talking about the North American grey squirrel as the incarnation of all squirrels, when people elsewhere in the world would have very different experiences with their local native squirrels, who act quite differently to those.

Depends on where you live. I only have the Eurasian red squirrel in my country, and they are definitely not a nuisance to any vegetable planting plans.

A particular species of squirrels. I think people in this thread fail to make clear that this is exclusively about the North American grey squirrel. The Eurasian red squirrel is not invasive anywhere, And I strongly doubt anyone have any problem with having them in their bird feeder, since they are solitary and relatively shy creatures.

The immunity only applies to Republican presidents.

There are zero contemporary primary sources for his existence.

We have a lot more contemporay primary sources for the existence of Socrates than we have of Jesus (of which the number of contemporary primary sources is 0).

No, there arent a lot of texts from the 1st century AD about him. The majority by far stems from the second century or later.

Written up to a couuple of centuries after his supposed existence.

There most definitely is.

You are the one who is doing the misinforming. All of the sources you mention, except Josephus, were written up to more than a century after his supposed existence. With Josephus being written around half a century after his existence.

And as mentioned, the specific quotes from Josephus are of a dubious nature.

No, OPs question was perfectly fine, because it is necessary to stress the fact that we have not a single contemporary primary source that Jesus existed. So adding extra parameters is pretty pointless, since we cannot convincingly answer whether he actually existed, much less whether he was a religious figure. Scholars have reached a conjectural consensus that a Jesus in some form likely existed, but it is a consendus based on congecture and circumstantial evidence in the form of later secondary sources.

Completely unlikely since no such census records are extant.

People who are jnfamilhar with the historiography are very much overestimating the amount of primary source material which exists from the Roman Empire, simply because historians have been very good at extracting information from the miniscule fraction (relative to the amount which was produced) of extant written sources we do have from the period.

There are no such records. Just having any extant census records from the Roman Empire would have pretty sensational, let alone some stemming from Judea at the supposed time of Jesus.

The Nero reference you are mentioning was written by Tacitus over a century after he was supposed to have lived. The fact of the matter js that there is no contemporary primary rvidence of hus exisrence.

From what I’ve seen, this is mostly because white bread is junk food for them. A more natural bread like this is better.

No, it is the carbohydrates. “Natural” bread contain as many carbohydrates as industrially produced bread.

Also the '70s.