Link is to view on Libreddit, an alternative private front-end to Reddit.
What a bunch of boners, truly.
Anybody else have a problem with this part?
“Mod bots are allowed under the free api tier!”
“Ours aren’t.”
“Ok, what bots are yours?”
“These ones.”
“Ok, they’re exempt now.”
Like…. Wtf? Oh, I guess everything’s ok now then. This just rubs me the wrong way on multiple levels.
What a fucking crazy shit show. Thanks for sharing the non-reddit link.
Man i wish they’d just leave, reddit knows they cant replace them.
They can and have, is the thing.
There’s been a few subs knocked out by Reddit giving the mod roles to a greedy powermod. Some “regular” mods are becoming powermods by playing nice with the admins and requesting huge subreddits.
Reddit isn’t bluffing when they say “Open up or we will make you.” Some teams are reporting less than 24 hours passing between them getting the “admins are knocking on your door” message and the mod team being removed and replaced with a powermod that moderates 100 other subreddits.
It’s becoming obvious that you will be opened, like it or not. If mods want to continue to protest, they need to start doing malicious compliance. Subs are looking closely at Reddit’s rules and following them to the letter.
Did you know Reddit considers heavy profanity to be NSFW? So you could mark your community as NSFW and use AutoMod to ensure that every post has a curse word in the title. Then since your community is obviously NSFW Reddit can’t advertise on it, because ads don’t run on NSFW subs.
Other mods are avoiding this approach in fears that Reddit will just ban NSFW entirely. Those are the John Oliver subs. Reddit says “it can’t be a surprise what the sub is about” but clearly there’s leeway because /r/trees isn’t about trees and /r/marijuanaenthusiasts isn’t about marijuana enthusiasts. Hence “only pictures of John Oliver”; if Reddit comes after that then they’d logically be banning /r/trees, /r/anime_titties, /r/196, etc. as well.
Reddit says that it’s a democracy (it isn’t, admins will always be dictators), and that users should decide the direction of the subreddit. Hence posts asking the users for their input. And of course they’re only listening to the demands of the users, after all…
The only way to damage Reddit is from inside Reddit. Make Reddit a miserable experience. They’re following all the rules! But it’s not a good place to be. Then promote communities elsewhere (also perfectly within the rules) to push people off of Reddit and onto other sites.
And they’re just doing exactly what the admins asked them to do, after all.
Yep. Doing “The_Donald” approach is the best way to trigger the death spiral, by making the content so annoying and shitty that normal people simply won’t care to go on Reddit anymore.
My perspective on this is split. On one hand, “get back to work”, when they’re not paying anyone for that work, is upsetting. On the other, I’m sure that all the mods know whether or not they want to lead a community on Reddit or not. No one should be allowed to force them to run those communities; but leading troll campaigns isn’t going to make anything better. By all means, leave Reddit if that’s what you want. Don’t pretend to stay just to ruin it for other folks.
The issue with claiming that they’re ruining it for others is… They built those communities. Literally. Reddit is built by those volunteers - from the literal translations used for each language, to the moderator tools, to the anti-spam system, to the rules, the wikis, the guides, the weekly events. They built it. So it’s not “ruining it for others” if suddenly they decide to change drastically how they do things.
Not to mention that historically there have been plenty of examples of mods “ruining” their subs by deciding to change the rules, and until this point Reddit’s answer to user complaints has always been “tough shit, mods are gods, you can start a new subreddit.”
Why isn’t that the answer now? Why not let the users who are upset by John Oliver create /r/true_pics or /r/true_aww or whatever? They always had to resort to that in the past.
