• Wodge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    People buy a Nintendo console to play Nintendo games. As good as the steam deck is (and I really do want one, but GabeN has decided that Switzerland does not exist), you ain’t going to be playing Splatoon on it.

    Not everything has to be a contest. Let people like things that they like.

    • aalvare2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe not Splatoon specifically, but switch-exclusive single-player games run comparably or better on switch emulators running on the deck

      • firecat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Steam exclusive content of games isn’t a good thing. Moreover, it’s only a limitation of current technology until better hardware and software are developed. The Switch 2 can be better than Steam deck.

        • Flaimbot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Steam exclusive content

          great, because nobody asked for that anyways.

          The Switch 2 can be better than Steam deck.

          and the Deck 2 will be better than the Switch 2. what’s your point?

          • firecat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Deck 2 won’t be better because just like last time people like you overhype it to science fiction. It’s not a PC that plays games, its a Linux based operating system that requires Proton. You people falsely believe Valve is promoting Linux. Hardware specs aren’t good enough and cheap Valve doesn’t want to pay more.

            Nintendo has proven to create handheld devices before Valve was a company. Valve doesn’t care about gaming, Nintendo cares about their games.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Any x86 handheld console always has more games than the Switch including the Switch games

  • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Switch has worse specs than most phones these days, literally a phone is better. And don’t get me started on the eShop, it’s so bad.

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I bought a switch just to play with some simple games with my nephew. The last time i had anything to do with nintendo was the gamecube, and that was more of a joke purchase, but i still liked the quirkyness of it a lot.
      It has some cool features, like the controllers are fun (fun, not good) but holy hell, the e-shop… Also i was kinda shocked that they want full price for mario kart, a game from 2014! And the dlc is absolutely predetory. I asked in a Nintendo sub about that and if that is normal for nintendo games, because i genuinely didn’t know. And i caught so much shit for that. People told me that the game is just worth that much becase all the maps and stuff. And the dlc is cheap enough and yada yada. I even felt bad because they all called me a troll who only wants to stirr some shit up.
      The other day i was listening to the jimqisition podcast and she talked about marvel’s midnight suns and she absolutely loved the game, except that they put dlc costumes right next to your normal costumes to kinda trick you into buying pixel clothing, and that it’s so gross that she wouldn’t even recommend the game. Nintendo does exactly that, but in a game for children, but still they are somehow the wholesome vidio game company, with one of the most toxic fanboys i have ever seen. The console has trouble running disco Elysium for fucks sake. I absolutely regret giving them money, and that was right before other waaaaay better handheld consoles hit the market.

  • rainynight65@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Apples and oranges comparison. The Steam Deck is PC-adjacent hardware that can access a back catalogue of thousands of games going back twenty years, well before the Steam Deck was even an idea.

    The Switch is a game console with its own ecosystem, and it has existed for six years. Games have to be developed specifically for it. The only thing both have in common is that they’re handhelds.

  • Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve have a switch but steam deck is one of the best purchases I have ever made. It’s such a beautiful device. Not to mention you can change the internal storage and add expandable storage. The biggest advantage steam deck has is its community.

  • jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The SD had the Switch’s entire library the day it came out, no fucking shit it has thousands more games from the day it came out even ignoring that

  • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    but which platform has more shovelware to sift through? Using the Nintendo store feels like swimming through a literal shit hole that someone dumped a tiny bag of gemstones into.

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I only have a Switch and want a Steam Deck, I’m not gonna lie, emulation is one of the biggest selling points to me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • GreenWater [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nintendo has always had competition with superior hardware in the handheld department. The Sega Nomad, WonderSwan, and Playstation Vita were all good examples of that. Nintendo products being much cheaper are always what keeps them ahead with handheld consoles.

    • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It doesn’t hurt that they also have a plethora of decent fist party franchises to put on their system. Other companies just get generic third party games that you can also play on PC

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lol much cheaper? A nintendo game from 25 years ago will be resold for $70 today. You can buy Doom on the switch for about $60 and it might catch 30fps you can buy the same game for playstation or xbox for like $15. Have you ever priced their used games for switch? They are laughably expensive

        • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yes and at $300 to $400 for a Deck and roughly the exact same price for a new switch Im saying that the cost is greater long term for Nintendo when you buy their overpriced games that dont even run at full fps. You essentially are paying the same price (maybe what like $100 less if you get the cheaper switch) for a tablet. If you were going to just buy both and set them on the shelf and never buy a game to play on them then maybe I would understand where you are coming from but you have to buy games to play on these or else why would uou buy one? Therefore the cost of the games should also be taken into account when considering the overall price of the system.

      • GreenWater [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They were cheaper options at the time of their release. Nintendo games from the past have only increased in price because of the popularity of the brand that attracts collectors. You are correct about the long-term expenses being cheaper overall but the average person only looks at the price for the console itself and that is about as far as their long-term thinking goes. Fps does not matter as much to the more casual gamer that Nintendo attracts.

        The perceived cheapness is what gives Nintendo the advantage.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The biggest difference between then and now is that the switch was the first handheld that could reasonably play (some) full scale open world console games. Any handheld trying to compete before that effectively needed games specifically developed for it with limited scope. There wasn’t really the vibrant PC indie scene for easy ports to low spec hardware either, and the Switch was also the first to really court those.

      These handheld PCs are pretty much the first time there’s competition with a big library to be a real alternative. Before now, it would have also taken partnering with studios to convince them to port games to your device.

  • bradbeattie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have a Switch but have bought maybe 3 games for it tops. Where Steam has user reviews, a super simple refund policy, and frequent deep discounts, Nintendo’s purchasing experience is clearly lacking in a customer-friendly approach.

    Anyone asking for recommendations for their next gaming device, it’s Steam Deck every time.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      And Nintendo insists on never discounting certain games. It’s hard to swallow paying $60 for a 5 year old game that I’m only somewhat interested in. Meanwhile steam will let you buy a game like that for $15 bucks. Half the time you buy it and never play it, but just wanted to get it on sale just in case you do find time to give it a go.

      • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Plus most people will already a pretty stacked library day 1 when they get a steam deck. I wouldn’t have to buy another game for years or even a decade if I were to get a steam deck just based on what I still have on my backlog.

        And if I buy a game for the steam deck I can still play it on my pc whenever

    • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t forget a more user friendly digital download SHARING system as well… We tried “SHARING” a digital download switch game a few times… Steam is far more forgiving. Switch wins on swapping carts however, if you stick to physical purchases for sharing.